France’s AMF lists ecxtrade.com among websites offering forex investments without authorisation in France. The joint AMF and ACPR quarterly statement places the domain in the forex list. ABE Infoservice dates its entry to July 28, 2026.
Why the Forex Category Matters
The French list separates foreign-exchange offers from cryptoasset derivatives. The entry belongs to the former. Readers looking up the warning should match the full domain and category, particularly because the quarterly statement also lists unrelated sites.
Two Dates for One French Warning
July 28 is the date the authorities added ecxtrade.com to the blacklist. October 22 is the date the AMF and ACPR published their quarterly bulletin. Someone who received a solicitation in August can use the July entry to establish that the domain was already listed when the message arrived.
The quarterly bulletin counted 26 additions to the forex category and ten additions to the cryptoasset derivatives category during the third quarter. Those figures count websites across the lists. They tell us nothing about how many customers dealt with ecxtrade.com, how much they invested or how their accounts performed.
The published table places trading.corso-web.com beside ecxtrade.com in a second column. Each column lists separate addresses. The authorities give no ownership relationship between those two entries. Matching a domain against the list is a different task from tracing a group of websites back to one business.

Registration Before the French Listing
The December 2015 registration predates the French warning by more than a decade. The January 2026 change event records a registry update without identifying a transfer of ownership.
Verisign’s November 4 record lists GoDaddy.com, LLC as registrar and December 5, 2026 as the registration’s expiry date at the time of the check. The registrar administers the registration. Its name identifies neither the firm that offered the investment nor the beneficiary of an investor’s payment.
The registration record and the failed website requests answer different questions. A registry can still have a record for an address that a browser cannot reach. Neither observation establishes when a website stopped accepting customers, whether accounts were moved to another address, or whether a customer could withdraw a balance.
Can the Operator Be Identified?
In the ABE Infoservice entry, the website and the forex category are filled in, but the business-name field is blank. That leaves no legal name or incorporation number in that row to match against a company register. A search for a similar trading name could identify a business unrelated to the offer.
The French authorities direct readers to REGAFI to check investment-service providers. For a specific offer, start with the legal name on the proposed agreement. Compare the name, contact details and service described there with the regulator’s record. A registration belonging to a similarly named firm would not establish who controlled ecxtrade.com.
Unverified Forex Terms
The forex listing gives no leverage ratio, spread or overnight financing schedule. No contract was available to determine how an account holder could request payment.
Direct HTTP and HTTPS requests could not resolve ecxtrade.com on November 4, 2026.
The distinction matters when reading an old account statement. A quoted exchange rate does not disclose the spread the customer paid. A balance shown on a dashboard does not show how much the customer deposited, which trades were executed or whether the balance was available for withdrawal.
A dated fee schedule would help establish the charges a customer agreed to. Trade confirmations could then show whether the provider applied those terms. Without those documents, there is no sound basis for assigning ecxtrade.com a minimum deposit, quoting a fee to release money or attributing a promised rate of return to the website.
How to Trace the July 28 Entry
The ABE Infoservice date identifies the individual listing, while the joint AMF and ACPR statement places the address in a quarterly forex list. Use the individual date when comparing a customer’s first contact with the public warning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Registration Date Identify the Broker?
Verisign records registration on December 5, 2015. A domain registration can predate an offer by years. It does not establish who marketed investments when the French authorities added their warning.
Does the Listing Establish That a Withdrawal Was Refused?
The French notice addresses permission to offer forex investments. It gives no account number, dated withdrawal request, response from an operator or payment outcome. Those separate records would be needed to assess a complaint about a particular account. A failed attempt to reach the website cannot establish the outcome either.
What If an Offer Used a Different Address?
Record both the address in the original message and the final address shown in the browser, including any prefix and login path. The French entry names ecxtrade.com. If the message led elsewhere, retain the link or redirect evidence before attributing the offer at that destination to the listed domain.
Conclusion and Reporting Guidance
A July 2026 French warning is established. Identifying the contracting company behind a specific offer still requires an agreement or payment record naming that party.
If money was sent, distinguish the business name in the sales material from the beneficiary shown on the payment receipt. Include the payment date, amount, currency and transaction reference when contacting the payment provider. If a withdrawal is disputed, attach the original request and the reply so the sequence can be checked independently.
Keep the original forex offer, including the address used to log in, and send dated copies to the relevant regulator if you were approached.
How to Report Financial Fraud · Fake Broker / Unlicensed Platform