On June 14, 2018, Estonia’s financial supervisor identified Ten Barosh OÜ, registry code 14447986, as offering derivatives through fxbreeze.com and cryptatrade.com without the required Estonian investment-services licence. A separate MFSA bulletin records an Italian cease order naming Fx Breeze and fxbreeze.com.
Tracing Registry Code 14447986
The Estonian e-Business Register returns Teamsale OÜ for code 14447986 and lists Ten Barosh OÜ as its former name. It records incorporation on March 14, 2018 and deletion on December 3, 2019. Matching the code explains the different names without implying that this company controls the domain today.
How fxbreeze.com Dates Compare With the Company Record
Verisign dates registration to November 20, 2015. Its October 23, 2026 change event comes years after Teamsale’s deletion. The event supplies no basis for connecting a later registrant to that company.
Which Derivatives Were Offered?
The term derivatives covers several products. No instrument-level contract, margin schedule or withdrawal provision was retrieved for either website named in the Estonian notice.
Direct HTTP and HTTPS requests could not resolve fxbreeze.com on November 4, 2026.
Two Websites, One Estonian Company Identifier
Registry code 14447986 distinguishes Ten Barosh OÜ from similar trading names. The Estonian supervisor connected that identifier with two websites. In a customer file, preserve which site made the offer and whether the payment instruction actually named the same company.
One Company Timeline and a Longer Domain Timeline
The November 2015 registration of fxbreeze.com predates the March 2018 incorporation recorded for company 14447986. That makes it possible to rule out one tempting interpretation of the dates. The domain’s registration date cannot serve as evidence that this Estonian company began operating the site in 2015. The supervisor supplies a more precise point of contact between the two histories. Its June 2018 warning connects Ten Barosh OÜ to the derivatives offer at the named websites during the company’s recorded lifetime.
The other end of the timeline matters as well. A change to a domain record in October 2026 came long after the company’s December 2019 deletion. The change record does not identify what a visitor would have seen on that day. It does not say who received an earlier customer’s money. Someone investigating a message received after the deletion needs a dated link between the sender and that earlier business. Reuse of the words FX Breeze would be a starting point for the inquiry, not a complete chain of ownership.
How to Interpret a Trade Confirmation
A customer who has lost access to the original platform may still have a confirmation identifying a particular trade. Look for the instrument name, opening date, size and account number. If the confirmation uses the term derivative, the underlying asset and the contractual position can be different things. For example, a price reference to an asset does not itself document that the customer took delivery of that asset. This matters when describing what was purchased or asking a payment provider to investigate a transfer.
Next compare the account number with the document that acknowledged the opening deposit. Keep the site address visible, especially if correspondence mentions both fxbreeze.com and cryptatrade.com. Estonia named both in its warning, but an individual statement may refer to only one. For the Italian measure, the bulletin specifically identifies Fx Breeze. Matching each document to its own website, account and date preserves the strongest evidence in this case: the regulator’s named company and registry code, together with a customer record that may identify the particular transaction.
For someone tracing an Estonian counterparty, the former name can be as valuable as the current registry label. Searching archived correspondence under both names can uncover a document that a search for the website alone would miss.
Why Both Estonian Company Names Matter
Someone preparing a report from an old invoice might reasonably search for Ten Barosh and wonder why the register returns Teamsale. Use the registry code as the link between the invoice and the register, then keep the former name in the report exactly as it appeared on the invoice. That preserves a detail a regulator or bank can search in its own records. The date of the invoice can then be compared with the period when the company existed, independently of the much longer registration history of the website. In the register, a search by number keeps the inquiry tied to a single legal entity even as its name changes. A search by website alone offers no equivalent identification safeguard.
Frequently Asked Questions
Were the Investment Plans in the Italian Bulletin Offered by Fx Breeze?
The bulletin assigns those investment plans to Bv1 Club Business Development SAS. The Fx Breeze paragraph concerns unauthorised investment services. The Estonian notice specifically describes derivatives. Neither finding supplies a verified Fx Breeze return rate.
Conclusion and Reporting Guidance
The historical company match and derivatives warning are documented. The deleted registry entry leaves later ownership, customer balances and any right to repayment unresolved.
For a report about a historical account, include the contract date, company code if printed, instrument traded and destination of any transfer.
How to Report Financial Fraud · Fake Broker / Unlicensed Platform