Italian, Maltese and Spanish regulators documented fxnobels.io in 2019. The present domain registration began in April 2026. A request to the address now redirects to a different hostname, leaving continuity with the historical brokerage unverified.
How the Brokerage Described Its Accounts
CONSOB recorded MetaTrader 4 and Status as the platforms on the .io site. Investors could open and fund a trading account for instruments including forex, securities and CFDs. Its base account was divided into bronze, silver and gold, with a separate premium option.
| Record | Detail | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Base | Bronze, silver and gold | Deposit amounts were not specified in Resolution 20799. |
| Premium | Separate account category | Promoted benefits varied by account. |
| Trading software | MetaTrader 4 and Status | Software access is distinct from regulatory permission. |
| Supplementary features | Signals and Traders Live | No verified track record was supplied in the order. |
What the Tier Names Leave Out
According to the order, the minimum deposit and promised benefits varied by account type. The regulator also noted signals and live-trader features. It did not specify a monetary threshold or guaranteed yield for any tier. The Maltese notice additionally records a website claim about trading cryptocurrencies.
CONSOB Resolution 20799 · MFSA Warning on fxnobels.io
Malta, the Platform Licence and the Italian Order
Malta’s MFSA said on January 17, 2019 that the entity was neither registered as a Maltese company nor authorised there and rejected its claimed Maltese operating address. CONSOB reported that the footer on the .io site used the label FXGNobels and that the platform appeared licensed to Glencoe Partners Ltd.
Malta’s FXNobels Warning · CONSOB Resolution 20799
Comparing the Two Domain Spellings
Resolution 20799, dated January 31, 2019, covers both www.fxnobel.com and www.fxnobels.io. CONSOB found substantially similar presentation. Some corporate details appear only in its description of the .com site. Spain’s February 25 warning puts the two domains on separate rows.
CONSOB Resolution 20799 · CNMV Warning Naming fxnobels.io on February 25
An April 2026 Registration and a Different Destination
The current fxnobels.io registry record dates registration to April 23, 2026 and expiration to April 23, 2027. Both direct requests redirected to cineblog01.io and ended in HTTP 525, an encrypted-connection handshake failure. That is evidence of a redirect during this check, not a verified successor investment platform.
What the Account Evidence Leaves Open
The notices support account names and advertised instruments, but no verified cash-out timetable, commission schedule or customer-level refusal. The current redirect gave no access to historical customer terms.
What the fxnobels.io Redirect Can Establish
The current registration began in 2026, after the 2019 warnings. A redirect today documents where this address now sends a visitor. To connect that destination to the historical brokerage would require evidence extending across the intervening years.
What an Account Statement Could Add
An investor who remembers using MetaTrader 4 might reasonably recognise the platform in the Italian decision. The recognition narrows the search for records, but many accounts can use the same software. Check the server name, account number and legal name on the first statement, then compare them with the destination of the opening deposit. Those details can help distinguish a funded account from a demonstration login. For a dispute about a premium benefit, the relevant record is the offer in force when the upgrade was purchased. Resolution 20799 describes differences between tiers but gives no price with which to reconstruct an individual upgrade.
Which Platform Did the Customer Actually Use?
An order describing both MetaTrader 4 and Status cannot on its own establish which platform a particular investor used. An original welcome email may identify the designated platform, while an exported trade history can show the platform on which an order was recorded. If those differ, preserve both and look for a dated message explaining a move or a second account. That sequence is more informative than assigning every trade to the best-known platform in the decision, particularly when a dispute concerns signals or benefits promised under a particular tier. For a historic trade, the platform statement may retain the instrument symbol and transaction time. Those details can distinguish a specific order from a general description of the account benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was a Platform Software Licence a Brokerage Permission?
No. CONSOB recorded a platform reference to Glencoe Partners. Its separate finding concerned the absence of authorisation to offer investment services to Italian investors. The two licences serve different purposes.
Does the 2026 Registration Invalidate the 2019 Warnings?
Malta and Spain documented the fxnobels.io offering in 2019. The more recent registration record prevents a simple inference of continuous operation and gives no basis for attributing the old business to a current registrant.
Conclusion and Reporting Guidance
The historical authorisation findings are corroborated in Malta, Italy and Spain. The 2026 registration and unrelated redirect leave the present operator on research hold. No customer loss or withdrawal refusal was independently established.
Preserve the exact suffix, account tier, platform name and date of correspondence. These details matter where a .com site, a .io site and a later redirect all appear in the record. Attach transfer references when reporting an actual payment.
Fake Broker / Unlicensed Platform · EU Investor Rights · How to Report Financial Fraud