The FCA named gmt-crypto.com in a July 10, 2018 clone warning. Two London addresses help distinguish the parties: the warning records 27 Old Gloucester Street for the clone, while the genuine partnership’s register entry gives 21 Gloucester Place.

Reading the Two London Addresses

The FCA records 27 Old Gloucester Street, WC1N 3AX for the clone. The genuine firm’s details in the same notice point to 21 Gloucester Place, W1U 8HR. Those are different streets, numbers and postcodes. A London address printed on a solicitation is insufficient to establish where its sender worked.

FCA Warning About gmt-crypto.com

FCA clone warning identifying gmt-crypto.com and the London address reported for GMT Crypto.
FCA clone warning identifying gmt-crypto.com and the London address reported for GMT Crypto.

Why Older Records Contain the Initials GMT

Companies House shows APSE Capital LLP, number OC313785, as an active limited liability partnership incorporated June 16, 2005. It used the name GMT Communications Partners LLP between May 11, 2007 and August 18, 2025. An earlier name included the numeral III.

Companies House Partnership Record

A Timeline of the Genuine Partnership
Record Detail Interpretation
June 2005 Partnership incorporated The original name included GMT Communications Partners III.
May 2007 Registered name changed The partnership dropped III from its name.
July 2018 FCA clone warning The regulator identified the separate GMT Crypto operation.
August 2025 Registered name changed again Companies House records the end of the GMT Communications Partners LLP name.

Verifying the Genuine Partnership

The FCA page identifies APSE Capital LLP under FRN 441230 and gives apsecapital.com for it. The company register independently gives its registered office as the second floor at 21 Gloucester Place. The historical name explains a plausible point of confusion without implicating the genuine partnership.

FCA GMT Crypto Warning · Companies House Partnership Record

What the Warning Can Establish About a Payment

The warning describes unauthorised impersonation, not a cryptocurrency investment contract. It identifies no token, wallet, fixed rate or withdrawal policy. Its general consumer-protection advice does not determine eligibility for reimbursement in an individual case.

FCA GMT Crypto Warning

What Became of gmt-crypto.com After the FCA Warning

An attempt to reach gmt-crypto.com returned no resolvable host by either protocol. The domain registry lookup also returned 404. The FCA first published its warning on July 10, 2018 and shows a November 21, 2020 update. Neither is a domain-registration date.

Domain Registry Lookup · FCA GMT Crypto Warning

What the FCA Notice Says About gmt-crypto.com

The evidence establishes a clone contact route. This investigation did not authenticate minimum investments, trading fees, wallet custody, redemption restrictions or a customer complaint tied to a particular transfer.

Two Gloucester Addresses, Two Parties

The difference between 27 Old Gloucester Street and 21 Gloucester Place is small enough to miss in a quick search. The FCA recorded the former for the clone and the latter for the genuine partnership. Preserve the street number exactly as it appeared in the offer.

Reconstructing the Address on an Invitation

For a reader reviewing an old GMT invitation, the street name is as important as the house number. Old Gloucester Street and Gloucester Place are different addresses. Transcribe the postcode before searching a map or company register. Then compare that complete line with the entries in the FCA warning. A search using only “GMT” and “Gloucester” can conceal the very difference the notice preserves. The date on the invitation matters too. A search under today’s partnership name may retrieve APSE Capital LLP, whereas a document from the earlier period may use GMT Communications Partners LLP. The partnership’s recorded name history explains that difference without authenticating the invitation.

If an old email gives only a building number and the word Gloucester, search the original attachment before assigning the address to either party. The postcodes in the FCA record provide a useful cross-check. WC1N 3AX accompanies the Old Gloucester Street address given for the clone. W1U 8HR accompanies the Gloucester Place address given for the genuine partnership. An email that omits both the postcode and the rest of the street name may simply leave too little information for a reliable match. Preserve that uncertainty in the report. For a payment dispute, record the beneficiary as it appeared on the transfer receipt. The genuine partnership’s name history provides no independent reason to substitute its name for a different named beneficiary.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a Match on the Initials GMT Identify the Sender?

No. The genuine partnership previously used GMT in its registered name, while the FCA expressly identified the operator using gmt-crypto.com as a clone. Compare the website and contact channel as well as the name.

Where Can the Genuine Address Be Checked?

Both the official company register and the FCA’s genuine-firm section identify Gloucester Place. Preserve any message using Old Gloucester Street so the two records can be compared accurately.

Conclusion and Reporting Guidance

The FCA finding establishes impersonation by the historical GMT Crypto operation. The genuine partnership’s registration and address are independently corroborated. Attribution of subsequent messages or transfers requires separate evidence.

If an approach used the GMT name, save the original sender details, the exact London address quoted and any payment instructions. Report it through the FCA’s official channels and provide the dated records to your payment provider if funds were sent.

Clone Firm Fraud · How to Report Financial Fraud