Italy’s CONSOB lists it.cryptocapitalfx.com under Resolution 20959, dated June 12, 2019 and published June 17. The table identifies CryptoCapitalFX, classifies the activity as investment services and leaves the place of business undetermined.
Separating Two June Resolutions
The June 17 publication includes several measures dated June 12. Number 20959 names CryptoCapitalFX. Number 20960 concerns TQRTrade and number 20962 identifies Empika Enterprise Ltd with other websites. Those adjoining entries do not identify the owner of CryptoCapitalFX.
Tracing it.cryptocapitalfx.com
The parent-domain lookup for cryptocapitalfx.com returned HTTP 404. The resolution documents historical use of it.cryptocapitalfx.com but leaves both its launch date and subsequent control unresolved.
What the Investment Services Entry Covers
The Italian entry does not specify whether customers dealt in cryptoassets, derivatives or another instrument. No fee schedule, account agreement or redemption policy was available to resolve that question.
Direct HTTP and HTTPS requests could not resolve it.cryptocapitalfx.com on November 4, 2026.
The Missing Name Behind Resolution 20959
For a customer tracing a payment, the most consequential detail is the undetermined place of business. Resolution 20959 gives that customer a reference for the Italian-language offer, but no office or legal counterparty to pursue. The adjacent resolution numbers cannot fill the gap. An account-opening agreement or original transfer instruction naming the beneficiary would give investigators a name to compare with the CryptoCapitalFX brand.
Where the Parent Domain Adds Evidence
There is another way to investigate the CryptoCapitalFX name. Before the Italian decision, regulators in Cyprus and Spain had addressed the parent domain, cryptocapitalfx.com. CySEC’s April 10, 2019 announcement concerned a claimed connection to A. Eternity Capital Management Ltd. The licensed firm’s number was 346/17. CySEC rejected the claimed association. Spain’s CNMV separately named the parent website on April 15. Those records extend the chronology of the brand beyond the Italian publication and give a reader a specific licence claim to check against an old offer. CySEC Warning for the Parent Domain · CySEC Register of Licensed Investment Firms · CySEC Announcement Index · Spanish CNMV Notice of April 15
The distinction between those addresses matters. An agreement displaying the parent domain and licence 346/17 can be compared directly with the Cypriot warning. A message containing it.cryptocapitalfx.com can be compared directly with Resolution 20959. A customer might possess both documents, in which case the dates and account references could help establish how they relate. The official records alone cannot show that every reader of the Italian offer saw the same licence claim or paid the same recipient.
How to Reconstruct a CryptoCapitalFX Payment
Start with the first document that asked for money. Record the account name exactly as printed, the currency requested and any customer reference. Compare those three details with the bank’s confirmation of the transfer. If the instruction used the CryptoCapitalFX brand but the confirmation names a different beneficiary, keep both names in the report. Describe where each appeared. The difference is a lead that a payment provider can investigate, even when the customer’s agreement gives no verifiable office address.
The word “crypto” can send this inquiry in the wrong direction. A euro bank transfer provides a bank beneficiary and a transfer reference. A transfer of a digital asset instead calls for the network and transaction identifier. Use whichever record the customer actually has. A screenshot of an account balance may help date what the website displayed, but the transaction document supplies evidence that value left the customer’s account. This distinction matters especially here because the Italian entry identifies a category of financial activity without naming the instrument involved.
A useful chronology would put the date of the first invitation linked to it.cryptocapitalfx.com beside the date of the first payment. That lets someone reviewing the file see whether the transaction preceded or followed publication of the Italian decision.
Which June Date Belongs on a Report?
A customer describing an approach on June 14, 2019 faces a small but important dating question. By then CONSOB had adopted Resolution 20959, but its June 17 publication still lay ahead. Writing that the customer invested after the public warning would introduce an error even though the decision itself predates the investment. Give the approach, transfer, decision and publication their own dates wherever the documents allow. A bank or regulator can then reconstruct what happened without assuming that a customer could already have consulted the published entry. The most useful date on a forwarded message is the date of the original invitation. A later forwarding date may tell a different story.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Name Establish a Cryptocurrency Investment Plan?
The entry describes investment services. It gives no token, yield, custody arrangement or redemption schedule. The brand alone cannot establish what an individual customer bought or whether any return was promised.
Conclusion and Reporting Guidance
The Italian resolution is verified at the level of domain, brand and activity. Establishing a counterparty or loss would require the customer agreement and independent transaction evidence.
Anyone reporting an approach can identify Resolution 20959 and preserve the original Italian-language offer from it.cryptocapitalfx.com, including its date and account instructions.
How to Report Financial Fraud · EU Investor Rights